Digitize Improvements, Quality, Safety, Maintenance, and more
Statistical Process Control, or SPC, applies statistical methods to monitor and control a process, so it will operate to its full potential to produce product(s) as specified.
Some of these terms deserve to be clarified:
Therefore the goal of SPC is to ensure a process operates to its capacity and also produces defect-free products. SPC uses statistics to monitor and control the process.
Several different quality programs use various forms of SPC. In the context of a Six Sigma-oriented company, monitoring is regular operational activity, and the defect rate is well defined. The nominal defect rate is at 3.4 defects per million opportunities, also known as "achieving a Process Sigma of 6".
One simple process is a machine that cuts a solid metal rod into shorter bolts.
The company's Six Sigma orientation has ensured that the specifications and operating guidelines are complete and realistic. The process – the machine – is rated to produce one bolt every second, with a tolerance of producing 57 to 64 bolts per minute. The output has clear specifications for length, diameter, whether the edge should be rough or smooth, etc. This example will focus only on the length, which has the three specified values: the minimum acceptable length; the maximum; and the nominal or desired length.
SPC requires taking measurements. This example discusses measuring the machine's throughput and the length of the bolt it produces.
One concern in statistics is "sampling bias". If measurements are always taken under the same conditions, then the samples are biased. For example, if the bolt is measured only when the machine is first started, a problem caused by the heat of friction after the first hour would be overlooked.
To avoid "sampling bias", observations should be made at different times and under different conditions. For example, take an observation:
How many samples should be measured? With the above machine, one approach may be:
Produce control charts showing:
The "length" chart is pre-printed with the nominal or desired length, as well as the minimum and maximum acceptable lengths. The inspector logs the length of each sample bolt on the row; calculates the average; and notes the range, the difference between the minimum and maximum, in that row.
At the end of the shift, the inspector calculates the average of the average lengths, as well as the average of the range of lengths, from the above rows.
The table would include this information:
|
Min: 0.9 |
Max: 1.1 |
Nom: 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
Date/ |
Bolt 1 |
Bolt 2 |
Bolt 3 |
Bolt 4 |
Bolt 5 |
Avg |
Range |
#1 |
0.98 |
0.99 |
1.02 |
1.02 |
0.99 |
1.000 |
.04 |
#2 |
1.02 |
0.99 |
1.02 |
.96 |
1.02 |
1.002 |
.06 |
(etc.) |
(etc.) |
(etc.) |
(etc.) |
(etc.) |
(etc.) |
(etc.) |
(etc.) |
#10 |
1.02 |
1.02 |
.99 |
1.07 |
1.09 |
1.038 |
.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHIFT |
|
|
|
|
|
1.022 |
.08 |
A simple quality control inspection would remove any defective bolts that are found, but SPC in Six Sigma is more concerned with the process. Therefore, once the entire table is complete, calculate the standard deviation of these observations, sigma (s):
Plot these numbers on a graph, and review for trends. In this example, the average length is creeping toward the maximum acceptable value. This may indicate that a part in the machine is wearing out, and might be expected within the maintenance cycle for this machine. The range also is increasing; perhaps that is unusual and should be examined. Both the range and standard deviation are larger if the values range more widely.
A service process may support a number of observations:
The same general methods are available for services as for manufacturers. Measure, analyze, and take corrective action when problems are found.
By Oskar Olofsson